Abstract:
Sweet potato virus disease (SPVD) is a major constraint to sweet potato production in
Kenya. In addition to SPVD, low production of sweet potato in Kenya is also due to lack
of cultivars with consumer quality attributes such as high dry matter content. Use of
resistant cultivars is the most effective means of controlling the disease. This study aimed
at characterizing Kenyan sweet potato genotypes for SPVD resistance and high dry
matter content using morphological and simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers. A total of
314 genotypes were collected, established in a screenhouse and evaluated for their
reaction to SPVD using symptom severity. Severity of SPVD in each genotype was
determined using a scale of 1-5; where 1= no symptoms and 5=very severe symptoms.
Serological assays were done on 89 genotypes with a symptom severity score of between
1.00 and 1.50. Analysis of variance of the symptom severity scores showed that the
genotypes responded differently (P < 0.001) to SPVD in the screenhouse. Twenty
genotypes tested negative for both SPFMV and SPCSV and were considered
resistant/tolerant to SPVD.
Three hundred and fourteen genotypes were planted in the field and characterized using
42 morphological traits based on the CIP Research Guide 36 followed by cluster analyses
of the scored traits using unweighted pair group method with arithmetic means
(UPGMA). Tuber dry matter content was determined 5 months after planting in the field.
Phylogenetic analysis using morphological descriptors grouped the genotypes into two
xv
major clusters. None of the clusters clearly distinguished the 20 resistant genotypes from
the 294 susceptible ones. The tuber dry matter content significantly (P<0.001) varied
among the sweet potato genotypes. Genotypes with highest and lowest tuber dry matter
content were not distinguished from each other using UPGMA phenogram generated.
This indicates that morphological markers are not reliable in identifying and classifying
sweet potato genotypes into phenotypic groups based on their resistance to SPVD and
high dry matter. Therefore, morphological markers supplemented with molecular markers
need to be investigated for their potential application in identification of sweet potato
genotypes with SPVD resistance and high dry matter content.
Eighty nine sweet potato genotypes were selected following graft inoculation with
SPVD-infected scions and characterized using 6 SSR primer pairs. The amplified DNA
fragments were screened by capillary electrophoresis on the ABI 3730 genetic analyzer
and analysed using the Genemapper v3.7 software. Cluster and principal component
analysis (PCA) were done using NTSYS-pc version 2.11T. Six primer pairs were highly
polymorphic among the genotypes and polymorphic information content (PIC) varied
from 0.33 to 0.81 with an average of 0.47. The number of alleles within the 89 genotypes
across the 6 loci ranged from 10 to 17, with an average of 13.52. Cluster analyses showed
Jaccard’s coefficient from 0.5 to 1, with an average of 0.75 accounting for 50% variation
among the 89 genotypes. The phylogenetic and PCA analysis clustered 89 genotypes into
2 main clusters and 5 subclusters. The dendrogram did not reveal any unique clustering
of the sweet potato genotypes according to dry matter content or reaction to SPVD. The
genetic differences among the SPVD resistant and high dry matter content genotypes
xvi
revealed by the clustering into distinct groups suggest the presence of different sources of
resistance to SPVD and high dry matter. This study therefore indicates that there is a high
level of genetic diversity in sweet potato genotypes that are SPVD resistant and have high
dry matter. These genotypes can be used as parents in breeding programmes aimed at
improving the crop for the two traits.