Abstract:
Organizations have worked to reduce costs in order to increase profits and gain a
competitive advantage. This is accomplished through strategic procurement
practices, which help an organization gain a competitive advantage by contributing
to the organization's strategic goals and its ability to significantly increase
performance and productivity. The goal of this research was to look at the impact of
strategic procurement practices on the functioning of Kenya's devolved government,
problems have arisen by failure of the counties to observe strategic procurement
practices in Kenya, for instance there was a clear indication that Devolved Systems
of Governance do not adhere to strategic procurement practices, as was seen in
Bomet county that there was poor contract management after the devolved system
failed to inspect the bridge construction that costed a lot of tax-payers money and yet
the bridge was substandard, the bridge that was supposed to cost Kshs.2.4 million,
ended up costing Kshs 6.4million, this lead to high level of customer dissatisfaction,
since the public felt that they were not getting value for their money . The study took
place in the 10 counties namely Garissa, Kisii, Nyamira, Narok, Marsabit, Murang‘a,
Bomet, Nairobi, Kiambu and Homa Bay. The study adopted mixed research design,
both cross sectional and longitudinal design. A sample size of 186 people
constituting respondent from procurement and finance was selected from all the
counties, the study used stratified random sampling. The survey included both open ended and closed-ended questions. Pilot testing was carried out to establish the
instrument's reliability and validity. Statistical Packages for Social Science were used
to conduct the analysis. Multiple regression analysis and conventional F tests were
used to evaluate hypotheses, allowing all variables to be examined concurrently
rather than individually. Strategic supplier relationships, strategic e-procurement
practices, strategic negotiation practices, and strategic contract management were all
found to be significant predictors of Devolved Systems of Governance performance,
with strategic negotiation practice being the most significant of the four.
Furthermore, the research found that the Devolved Systems of Governance lacks
specific performance criteria and measurements for diverse stakeholders in county
government, particularly during contract award. As a proactive way of improving the
performance of Devolved systems, supply chain managers and finance managers
should adopt and embrace strategic supplier relationship practice, strategic e procurement practice, strategic negotiation practice, and strategic contract
management, according to the study. The report also suggests that devolved systems
of governance collaborate on product development with suppliers and include
suppliers directly or indirectly in strategic planning. Similarly, the study recommends
that the Devolved Systems of Governance strategically employ the best negotiation
strategies for a variety of reasons, including obtaining fair prices for specified item
quality, agreeing on delivery dates, deciding on packaging, packing, and mode of
transportation, and agreeing on payment terms, among others