Applicability of the Maturity Method as a Means of Estimating Concrete Strength

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Kaburu, Allan Mugambi
dc.date.accessioned 2016-10-31T05:51:15Z
dc.date.available 2016-10-31T05:51:15Z
dc.date.issued 2016-10-31
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2342
dc.description A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment for the degree of Master of Science in Construction Engineering and Management in the Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology 2016 en_US
dc.description.abstract In Kenya, quality control of concrete involves taking samples of poured concrete, preparing specimens under controlled conditions, and subjecting the specimens to strength testing to ensure that the design strength is achieved in 28 days. However, depending on prevailing in-situ temperature conditions, concrete strength prediction based on the 28-day rule may be inaccurate. Research has shown that this conventional concrete quality control protocol, which is easily circumvented, is not effective on ensuring structural reliability of new or existing buildings, as evidenced by the collapse of seventeen buildings between 2006 and 2014 in Kenya. The maturity method of estimating concrete strength, which was developed by the US National Bureau of Standards, has been successfully used to predict the strength of concrete prepared according to American standards and without admixtures, resulting in tighter quality control of concrete. This research set out to demonstrate that the method is equally applicable to concrete prepared according to the locally used British standards, and concrete containing a plasticizer - a chemical admixture which is gaining widespread use in the production of concrete. To this end, three mixes were prepared, one according to American standards (mix A) and two according to British standards (mixes B and C). Modified lignosulphonate (Sika Plastiment BV-40), a locally available plasticizer, was used to enhance the workability of mix C. Concrete mix proportioning according to British standards resulted in a denser mix (2400 kg/m3) than American standards (2342 kg/m3); this was the main difference between the two standards. Cylindrical specimens (each measuring 150 mm in diameter by 300 mm deep) and beam specimens (each measuring 150 mm wide by 530 mm long by 150 mm deep) were made and cured at 23 ºC. The compressive and splitting tensile strengths of the cylinders and the flexural strength of the beams were almost identical for the three mixes. Also, the internal temperature (and hence the calculated maturity) of concrete was the same for all mixes. These findings indicate that: (1) the choice of standards used to prepare concrete (American or British) has no effect on the strength and maturity of the resulting concrete mix; and (2) the maturity method may be applied to concrete containing a plasticizer. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship Signature: ……………………………….. Date: ………………………… Prof. James Wambua Kaluli JKUAT, Kenya Signature: ……………………………….. Date: ………………………… Eng. Charles KAarimi KAbubo JKUAT, Kenya en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher CEM, COETEC, JKUAT en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries Msc A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment for the degree of Master oMSc. Construction Engineering and Management;2016
dc.title Applicability of the Maturity Method as a Means of Estimating Concrete Strength en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account