Growth and yield of selected vegetables under alternate furrow irrigation in the “ASAL”areas of Eastern Kenya

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Mulei, Makau J.
dc.date.accessioned 2015-06-29T13:14:06Z
dc.date.available 2015-06-29T13:14:06Z
dc.date.issued 2015-06-29
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1704
dc.description A Thesis Submitted For The Partial Fulfillment Of Master Of Science Degree In Horticulture In The Department Of Horticulture Of Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture And Technology. en_US
dc.description.abstract Water shortage is almost always the factor limiting agriculture production in Arid and Semi-Arid lands (ASALs) world over. Water scarcity in today‟s world aggravated by climate change has resulted to increased competition for the resource. This has necessitated re-evaluation of irrigation water use management globally aimed at water conservation without overall reduced crop productivity. Kibwezi is a semi-arid area and successful farming there requires use of water saving irrigation technologies. To enhance the uptake of such technologies by the farmers, it is usually necessary to demonstrate and evaluate their effect on water use and crop performance. The objective of this study in this regard was to determine the effect of alternate furrow irrigation (AFI) water saving technology on productivity of selected horticulture crops. The effect of alternate furrow irrigation and conventional furrow irrigation (CFI) on growth and yields of selected vegetables in the ASAL areas of Kenya was evaluated. Tomatoes, Collards and Cabbages were grown at a selected site in Kibwezi for two periods in year 2010 and 2011.Growth, biomass accumulation and yields were monitored and quantified. Applied irrigation water was also monitored during the two seasons. In AFI half of the root system was irrigated alternately resulting to Partial Root Drying (PRD). CFI was the conventional way of furrow irrigation and refers to the system where every furrow was irrigated during each watering. Each treatment was replicated three times in RCBD design. The use of AFI resulted to less use of irrigation water with savings of upto 45%. Most parameters of growth were not significantly affected by AFI except Leaf Area (LA) and Dry Matter (DM). Crops irrigated under AFI had 20% and 40% reduction of LA and DM respectively compared to crops irrigated under CFI. There was no significant reduction in overall yields. In conclusion, AFI is a reliable way to save and hence reduce irrigation water use and this study recommends its use in arid and semi-arid areas of Kenya. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship PROF.PETER W. MASINDE………….……………………….Date……………….......... Meru University of Science and Technology PROF. PATRICK G. HOME……………………………………Date………………........... Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology PROF. CHARLES K. NJOROGE………………………….......Date………………........... Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology DR NJUE E. MUGAI……………………………………….........Date………………........... Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries MSc. Horticulture;2015
dc.subject Horticulture en_US
dc.title Growth and yield of selected vegetables under alternate furrow irrigation in the “ASAL”areas of Eastern Kenya en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account