dc.description.abstract |
Terrorism risk preparedness deters terrorist activities, reduces the likelihood of
successful insurgent’s operations and lowers morbidity and mortality rates during
terror attacks. While terrorism risk preparedness reduces the impact of attacks,
optimism bias stemming from the perceived low probability of such events often
leads to public complacency, weakening the effectiveness of traditional risk
communication. Actionable risk communication addresses this gap by translating
complex risk information into clear behavioral instructions. The study examines how
information attributes, source attributes, the choice of communication channels, and
strategies influence terrorism risk preparedness and assesses how risk perception
moderates this relationship. The study is grounded in a theoretical framework
integrating the Actionable Risk Communication Model, the Crisis and Emergency
Risk Communication (CERC) Model, and the Social Amplification of Risk Model
(SARM) and employs a mixed-methods approach, combining a survey, content
analysis, key informant interviews, and observation. A quantitative sample of 640
respondents was selected using multistage stratified purposeful random sampling
from various university campuses, shopping malls, public markets, and bus termini
in Nairobi City County. Qualitative data were collected through observation, content
analysis, and key informant interviews. Quantitative data were analyzed using
descriptive and inferential statistics, cross-verified with qualitative data, interpreted,
and explained through a narrative report. Findings reveal varying levels of risk
awareness and preparedness among residents with significant gaps, including,
inadequate educational and communication campaigns and low credibility for official
sources. Additionally, there are significant vulnerabilities in vigilance, surveillance,
and access controls at densely populated informal locations such as matatu termini
and public markets compared to formal locations such as university campuses and
shopping malls. The study recommends improving terrorism preparedness through
community education, multi-stakeholder collaboration, and tailored communication
strategies using credible sources and multiple media channels. Academically, it
contributes to the limited body of research on urban African contexts and advances
theory by adapting established models to Nairobi's socio-economic realities.
Practically, it offers guidance for policymakers, emergency responders, and
communication professionals to build community resilience through more effective
and trusted risk messaging. |
en_US |