A cross-sectional study on the microbiological quality and safety of raw chicken meats sold in Nairobi, Kenya

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Odwar, Joyce Arua
dc.contributor.author Kikuvi, Gideon
dc.contributor.author Kariuki, James Ngumo
dc.contributor.author Kariuki, Samuel
dc.date.accessioned 2017-05-23T13:46:42Z
dc.date.available 2017-05-23T13:46:42Z
dc.date.issued 2017-05-23
dc.identifier.uri https://bmcresnotes.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1756-0500-7-627
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/3159
dc.description.abstract Background: Chicken is a rich source of meat protein and is increasingly being consumed in urban areas in Kenya. However, under poor hygienic environment, raw chicken meat presents an ideal substrate supporting the growth of pathogenic Escherichia coli and Coliform bacteria indicating the potential presence of other pathogenic bacteria; this may constitute a major source of food-borne illnesses in humans. This study sought to assess the microbiological quality and safety of raw chicken meat sold in Nairobi, Kenya by determining the E. coli/coliform contamination levels as well as the antimicrobial resistance patterns and pathogenicity of E. coli isolated. Findings: We conducted a Cross-sectional study to collect two hundred raw chicken samples that were randomly purchased between the periods of August 2011-February 2012. Enumeration of bacteria was done using 3 M Petri film E. coli/Coliform count plates, isolation and identification of E. coli through standard cultural and biochemical testing, antimicrobial susceptibilities interpreted according to criteria set by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (2012) while Polymerase chain reaction assays were used to determine presence of virulence genes in isolated E. coli. Data was analyzed using SPSS version 17.0. Contamination rates were 97% and 78% respectively for Coliform bacteria and E. coli. Seventy six percent of samples fell under the unacceptable microbial count limit (>100 cfu/ml) and significant differences in the E. coli/coliform counts (p < 0.001) were observed among the chicken retail outlets with samples from supermarkets having the lowest level of contamination compared to the rest of the retail outlets. Seventy five percent of the isolates were resistant to at least one of the 12 antibiotics tested with resistance to tetracycline being the highest at 60.3%. In addition 40.4% E. coli isolates were positive for the ten virulence genes tested. Conclusion: Raw retail chicken meats in Nairobi are not only highly contaminated, but also with potentially pathogenic and multi-drug resistant strains of E. coli. It will be important for public health authorities and retail chicken processing outlets to collaborate in ensuring adherence to set out principles of hygienic processing and handling of chicken meats in order to reduce potential risks of infection. Keywords: Raw retail chicken meat, E. coli/coliforms, Microbial counts en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Biomed Central en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries BMC research notes;7(1), 627.
dc.subject Raw retail chicken meat en_US
dc.subject E. coli/coliforms en_US
dc.subject Microbial counts en_US
dc.subject JKUAT en_US
dc.subject Kenya en_US
dc.title A cross-sectional study on the microbiological quality and safety of raw chicken meats sold in Nairobi, Kenya en_US
dc.type Article en_US

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


My Account