The Effects on Tuberculosis Treatment Adherence from Utilising Community Health Workers: A Comparison of Selected Rural and Urban Settings in Kenya

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Ong’ang’o, Jane Rahedi
dc.contributor.author Mwachari, Christina
dc.contributor.author Kipruto, Hillary
dc.contributor.author Karanja, Simon
dc.date.accessioned 2017-02-28T08:04:53Z
dc.date.available 2017-02-28T08:04:53Z
dc.date.issued 2017-02-28
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2726
dc.description.abstract Introduction: Community Health Workers (CHWs) have been utilised for various primary health care activities in different settings especially in developing countries. Usually when utilised in well defined terms, they have a positive impact. To support Kenya’s policy on engagement of CHWs for tuberculosis (TB) control, there is need to demonstrate effects of utilising them. Objectives: This study assessed TB treatment adherence among patients who utilised CHWs in management of their illness in comparison to those who did not in urban and rural settings. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in selected health facilities using standard clinical records for each TB patient registered for treatment between 2005 to 2011. Qualitative data was collected from CHWs and health care providers. Results: The study assessed 2778 tuberculosis patients and among them 1499 (54%) utilized CHWs for their TB treatment. The urban setting in comparison with the rural setting contributed 70% of patients utilising the CHWs (p,0.001). Overall treatment adherence of the cohort was 79%. Categorizing by use of CHWs, adherence among patients who had utilized CHWs was 83% versus 68% among those that had not (p,0.001). In comparison between the rural and urban settings adherence was 76% and 81.5% (p,0.001) respectively and when categorized by use of CHWs it was 73% and 90% (p,0.001) for the rural and urban set ups respectively. Utilisation of CHWs remained significant in enhancing treatment adherence in the cohort with unadjusted and adjusted ORs; OR 2.25, (95% 1.86–2.73) p,0.001 and OR 1.98 (95% 1.51–2.5) p,0.001 respectively. It was most effective in the urban set-up, OR 2.65 (95% 2.02–3.48, p,0.001) in comparison to the rural set up, OR 0.74 (95% 0.56–0.97) p = 0.032. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.subject Community Health Workers (CHWs) en_US
dc.subject Tuberculosis en_US
dc.subject JKUAT en_US
dc.subject Rural en_US
dc.subject Urban en_US
dc.title The Effects on Tuberculosis Treatment Adherence from Utilising Community Health Workers: A Comparison of Selected Rural and Urban Settings in Kenya en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account